Methodologies

Microsoft Word - BMAS-WG2_Tratwal et al_review2_230120.docx

Aim(s)

Encourage the use of standardized methodologies for the assessment of BMA

Members

  • Annegreet Veldhuis-Vlug
  • Olaia Naveiras
  • Biagio Palmisano
  • Rossella Labella
  • Nathalie Bravenboer
  • Greet Kerckhofs
  • Eleni Douni
  • Erica Scheller
  • Sammy Badr
  • Dimitrios Karampinos
  • Sarah Beck-Cormier
  • Antonella Poloni
  • Maria Jesús Moreno Aliaga
  • Jackie Fretz
  • Matthew S Rodeheffer
  • Parastoo Boroumand
  • Clifford Rosen
  • Mark Horowitz
  • Andre van Wijnen
  • Moustapha Kassem
  • Joroen van de Peppel
  • Christophe Chauveaux
  • Tim Schulz
  • Odile Broux

Approach

  • Methodologies to consider for discussion include cell culture, analysis methods, such as osmium staining, Marrow Quant, MRI etc.
  • Identify subject-related factors in the methodologies that may explain inter-laboratory variation (age, sex, strain, etc.)
  • Identify environment-related factors in the methodologies that may explain inter-laboratory variation (temperature, humidity, commonly used chemicals/compounds, etc.)

Issues related to methodologies

  • Methodologies to consider for discussion include cell culture, analysis methods, such as osmium staining, Marrow Quant, MRI etc.
  • Identify subject-related factors in the methodologies that may explain inter-laboratory variation (age, sex, strain, etc.)
  • Identify environment-related factors in the methodologies that may explain inter-laboratory variation (temperature, humidity, commonly used chemicals/compounds, etc.)

Update: Methodologies paper is now published!